Platega® blend Rh vs. Platega® blend Rh eco

This comparison article is aimed at users in jewellery, eyewear and industrial electroplating who need to decide between performance-optimised and cost-optimised platinum-rhodium electrolytes.
Which rhodium alternative is right for your application?
Brilliant white surfaces with a rhodium appearance are indispensable in jewellery, eyewear and technical coatings. At the same time, many businesses face the same question: maximum performance – or maximum cost-effectiveness?
With Platega® blend Rh and Platega® blend Rh eco, two perfectly matched platinum-rhodium electrolytes are available. They achieve the same visual outcome – but differ deliberately in technical and economic terms.
This article helps you make the right decision for your application.
One look, two philosophies
Both systems produce highly glossy white deposits with an almost pure rhodium appearance.
The difference is not in the visible result, but in the strategic focus:
• Platega® blend Rh: performance, speed, process headroom
• Platega® blend Rh eco: cost reduction and resource efficiency
Platega® blend Rh – when performance makes the difference
Platega® blend Rh is the first choice when high throughput and process reliability are critical.
Thanks to the higher precious metal content in the bath, the process runs particularly stably and allows faster deposition.
Typical advantages
- Shorter coating times
- High reproducibility in series processes
- More process headroom for demanding applications
When is Platega® blend Rh ideal?
- Series production
- Industrial applications
- Short cycle-time processes
- Customers focused on quality and throughput
Possible downside
The higher precious metal content means a higher initial bath investment and higher costs. For very thin layers or purely cost-driven applications, this is not always necessary.
Platega® blend Rh eco – the same brilliance, smarter costed
Platega® blend Rh eco was developed to make the rhodium look more economical.
Thanks to a significantly reduced precious metal content, both investment and operating costs are reduced without compromising on appearance.
Typical advantages
- The same brilliant white colour as Platega® blend Rh
- Significantly lower precious metal tie-up
- Lower bath costs
- A more resource-efficient approach
When is Platega® blend Rh eco ideal?
- Jewellery and eyewear plating
- Thin layer thicknesses
- Cost-optimised processes
- Smaller baths or frequent bath changes
Possible downside
Deposition is slower and offers slightly less process headroom – for very high volumes or extremely short cycle times, Platega® blend Rh has the advantage.
The products compared directly

Conclusion: the right choice depends on your priorities
There is no “better” or “worse” solution – only the one that fits:
• Platega® blend Rh
→ When maximum performance and short process times matter.
• Platega® blend Rh eco
→ When the same appearance at minimal cost is the priority.
Both systems deliver the same high-quality look – you decide which strategy best fits your process.
Further information:
Detailed technical data and application examples can be found on the relevant product pages.
Need advice?
We are happy to support you in selecting the optimal system for your application – practical, honest and solution-focused.